2013 Schweser Kaplan Cfa Level 1 Qbank Download Youtube

I used study materials from Bionic Turtle and (PremiumPlus) to pass the exam. I found the FRM Handbook and the GARP curriculum readings to be more useful as reference materials than as primary resources. Which was the most helpful to me between Bionic Turtle and? Hands down it was Bionic Turtle! STUDY NOTES The Bionic Turtle study notes are vibrant and filled with many colorful diagrams.

With BT you are provided with PDF files that you can print or read on your computer. At least last fall when I was studying for the Full FRM exam did not offer its customers the ability to obtain its FRM study notes in PDF format. VIDEOS I watched all of the weekly videos (they were offered live on Wednesday nights for 3 hrs at a time), but I didn’t seem to get much out of them. I felt like a lot of the time in the live online seminar was spent on “administrative” items. Also, the Schwser live online classes cover so much in so little time that I felt like the concepts were just being glossed over.

CFA Chartered Financial Analyst Level 1 2018 Textbooks This study kit contains summary study notes, question and answer banks and flashcards. The study notes are summaries and key points made from the CFA Institute and Kaplan Schweser CFA 2018 programs. We have taken 3000 textbook pages from the CFA.

In contrast, I found the Bionic Turtle videos to be far more substantial. BT devoted far more time to videos than (there are literally dozens of hours of videos that you an download that cover all areas of the curriculum). I felt like the BT videos took their time and really covered the concepts well.

IN RETROSPECT If I had to do it all over again I would use Bionic Turtle, and I would consider adding the materials as a supplement only if my company paid for it and there was no money leaving my pocket. It looks like right now one year of access to Bionic Turtle is going for $399 compared to $1,118 for PremiumPlus for levels 1 and 2 of. BT is such a bargain!!!!

Is fantastic for CFA and I am using it to study for CFA Level 3 this June. I haven’t found a study provider better than for CFA. However, with respect to the FRM exam I found the Bionic Turtle Materials to be far more helpful.

If the guys at Bionic Turtle are reading this, PLEASE consider offering a CFA study solution!!! I hope this helps!:-D. I used BT predominantly - while I went over the video I took enough notes but never got a chance to review. I used and surprisingly passed. Right on exam day I felt badly underprepared. Schwesers Q-Bank gives a false sense of security, the questions are too easy, IMHO.

Do have a good look ate the GARP provided sample exams! Videos are not worth the money as they are very superficial, but the Final Review Guidebook served as a good starting point for retention exercises.

I occasionally used the Risk Manager Handbook as a reference. If I were to do it again I would probably get AND ************, since the hand-on approach of BT is appealing to me, thought I have not tried any BT material yet. I also got the Hull book, incl. The Student Solution Manual, after the exam, and can highly recommend the book. It feels way more complete and comprehensive then the books. If you want to get anything of the assigned readings, thats a book I’d buy.

Also, I found the Basel II readings in left out a lot after I went through the original document over the holidays. So, following Schwesers suggestion to have a look at the original Basel II material can’t hurt, but I didn’t do it. I used as my primary prep material and skimmed through the past exam questions in the hand book. Also checked out few BT videos on Youtube available for free. FRM material didn’t cover the concepts in-depth some of the important concepts had superficial or confusing explanation.

Answering some of the FRM exam questions need in-depth knowledge on concepts hence using material is not a good idea. Even though I checked out few BT videos on youtube the concepts are explained in-depth and makes you feel confident tackling the tough questions in FRM exams. The hand book is huge its hard to go through the entire material but I felt some of the FRM questions are entirely based on the FRM hand book examples that were used for explaining the concepts.

This kind of makes sense because the FRM test creators may be referring this handbook while setting the questions. Which again makes you feel confident in cracking the FRM exam. If I were to do it again I would use BT as my prep material and refer hand book to clarify doubts on tough concepts and may be for review. —————————————————————————————————— >@bethesda: “I haven’t found a study provider better than for CFA.’ >>How about the CFAI?

The CFA Institute curriculum makes for very interesting reading. The selections are from some of the leading minds in the field.

I do occasionally refer to a CFAI reading or two when I have the time. However, the CFAI readings are much more lengthy than the corresponding readings from. If you have unlimited time the CFAI readings would probably be better than. However, given the limited amount of time I have to study I prefer to the CFAI readings for the CFA exam. Core readings for quant (helped me to get 1st quartile in quant ) Read Hull Chapters (since 20 odd chapters are from Hull text thru out the FRM Curriculam) Skimmed through Studied Handbook and diligently solved all the Handbook questions ( except credit risk and Investment management) I think I was better off studying Hull which helped me get 1st quartile in market risk and 2nd quartile in Risk models is horrible for ops risk and credit risk. I found FRM Handbook ops risk way superior to any other readings I wouldnt have even thought about getting 1st quartile in ops risk if not for Handbook I also watched few videos of BT and was diligently following the BT forum and solving the ‘question a day ’ those questions were one notch above FRM questions and were very involving. Took off from work for a week before exam and solved Handbook questions and practice tests.

If I were to do it again I would read complete Handbook along with Hull and quant core readings, omit, read BT Materials and watch BT videos. And for me as well. I think I’ve read the Study Notes three times in 3 months and did the the free GARP practice tests. I scored below average in the Final Tests (prolly because I finished it very fast) and failed the GARP practice exams but thankfully got 1st quartile in all but 2 subjects in the Actual exam (I’m 2nd quartile in Foundations of RM and forgot the other one). I’m really glad I used Scweser as I don’t have the luxury of time to read the Handbook and Core Readings as I am working full time. I think my CAIA background helped me as well (used plainly for both CAIA levels and passed both with flying colors). Will start my CFA soon and will definitely use again.

I must say the 2009 FRM exam was a difficult exam- very tricky questions plus very overwhelming coverage. Klarsolo Wrote: ——————————————————- >blueswan Wrote: >————————————————– >—– >>FRM in my opinion was as brutal as CFA L2. >Don’t >>underestimate this sucker. >>>>- Blueswan, CFA, CAIA, FRM >>I second that. Don’t underestimate the difficulty >of this exam. It’s easily as much to study as any >given CFA level, but the questions on the FRM exam >were trickier on average.

I respectfully but completely disagree, even though the pass rates for both are close (~40%). Sbloccare Modem Adsl2 Wifi Nanny. I found the studying and exam questions on the FRM to be pretty straightforward, with the exception of a scant few questions on the exam.

Maybe its because I have a more quant background (math undergraduate degree) and its one of my stronger areas on the CFA. The CFA exam will omit major parts of its ciricculum because there is so much material to study. The comprehensive-ness of it is what makes it so frustrating and difficult.

I’ve failed Level 2 twice now (Band 7 and 10). I passed FRM Level 1 in the highest quartile for 3 of the 4 sections (the other in the second quartile). I have to agree with mcpass on this one although I wouldn’t say “piece of cake”, but it feels easier than the CFA. Bionic Turtle is the undisputed leader in practice questions for FRM. Check them out at I used for studying but used Bionic Turtle for practice questions. Reading texts are great but the practice questions are not any where near the difficulty of the real exams but Bionic questions are about par with the difficulty of the real exams (this observation is common among a good number of FRM candidates). This was my combination and I am glad to say I passed both parts in the last Nov 2012 exam.

This is not to say that success is guaranteed if anyone follows this advice; maybe it just worked for me as we all have our peculiar circumstances that determine our ultimate chances.

I used last year and missed a pass (Band 9, not the fault of the study material), and I’m going straight from the CFAI books this year. After getting deep into the readings this year, I’ve decided nothing beats reading straight from the CFAI source material, and supplementing around that where needed. The level of detail the CFA books go into really allow for a deeper understanding of each LOS and I find it easier to put everything together and make connections that I wasn’t able to make last year using alone. So, for me, the following is the optimum way to approach Level II 1) CFAI books for readings, blue boxes and EOC practice sets 2) for Video lesson supplements and the 11th Hour Guide 3) for additional mock exams Of course, if you’re crunched for time, condensed study guide readings may be your only option. Animax Musix 2015 Osaka Download Games.

Aedgar wrote: I’m using program with Qbank. Either provider is good. More aligned with CFAI curriculum in my opinion. I would agree with that. Someone loaned me their L2 books until I got my results. Now that I have the books and the CFAI books; comparing all 3 side by side was an eye opener.

Follows the CFAI curriculum the closest and I would be nervous, based on some of the gaps I saw, to use books exclusively. Does have a great Qbank and practice exams though I disagree with the notion that is not complete/has gaps. On both level I and II I specifically remember 1, yes only 1, question that was not covered in the material. If you go through these books cover to cover a few times you will get 99% of what you need and learn things more efficiently than with CFAI alone.

I have used and will continue to do so - I am a bit of a homer though so make of it what you will. I have always felt very prepared when using their materials. Hey I did some research and started studying with the CFAI notes as the prep provider notes are not out yet. But i have decided to start properly once they come out because i dont want to burn myself out yet.

So, I plan on starting in August/September. I did go through Quant, FRA, Economics, Corp from the Curriculum back in March/April but i found it very vast in the sense that i couldnt pick out the important parts especially for the 2nd reading of Economics. Right now, I am reading books, Watching Aswath Damodaran videos just so that i do not completely forget about CFA. Also, if you have the time, id highly recommend you start going through important readings from Level 1. Especially FRA and equity as a lot of it is continued in L2 As for what i am planning on going for, Here is a list of the things im planning on getting: Self study + Video lessons ( I saw the video lessons for quant and i must say i understood quite a lot because of how comprehensive they were and was able to answer EOCs for all the 3 readings) Q bank + Practice exams ( I think i want to practice more than i did for level 1 for which i only used ) Also, I am planning on making copies of all the blue boxes and EOCs.

All these preparations are merely tools and i think nothing can beat hardwork and time dedicated. Hope this helps, Good luck! UnclePanda wrote: I used shweser for L1 2013 exam, and am getting the feeling that is better for L2. I plan to sit the exam in June 2017. I looked at the website and there are a few courses - i.e.

Silf study, silver, gold platnium. Which course do you guys think is good, I just want the books and don’t care for videos. How about the link below, is that enough?

What did you use for level 1 in terms of study materials (Notes, QBank, mocks)? The link you posted is just the study guide (like SchweserNotes). I find practice questions and mock exams really valuable in retaining information and grasping the concepts.

So I’d recommend a study package that includes some additional material, like the ‘Self Study Course’ offered. UnclePanda wrote: I used shweser for L1 2013 exam, and am getting the feeling that is better for L2. I plan to sit the exam in June 2017. I looked at the website and there are a few courses - i.e.

Silf study, silver, gold platnium. Which course do you guys think is good, I just want the books and don’t care for videos. How about the link below, is that enough? What did you use for level 1 in terms of study materials (Notes, QBank, mocks)? The link you posted is just the study guide (like SchweserNotes).

I find practice questions and mock exams really valuable in retaining information and grasping the concepts. So I’d recommend a study package that includes some additional material, like the ‘Self Study Course’ offered.

I only used books (not sure if thats the same thing as notes?) to study L1. I did CFAI EOF questions. I did two CFA mocks, or whatever the free ones they gave. And I bought secret sauce. I also did a two day full weekend review with CFA program, via a third party in Australia. I studied for four months to pass.

I plan to do the same thing for L2, but read Blue boxes in curriculum, spend more time on reading books - perhaps double. And, if I can, get more mock exams. I have heard Qbank not very good. But, I presume that isn’t mock? What do you guys think of third party mock exams?

I’ve used both and, though at different levels but here’s my take. I passed lvl 1 using, however I have to admit there were videos on particular topics where they do not explain enough for you to take the exam at all.

My saving grace was the qbank and the mocks. Those are solid on. But I was worried about the gaps going into the exam. I just passed lvl 2 this month using and curriculum. What I did was read the curriculum once thru, watch the videos & read their notes, then go back to the curriculum to skim for missing info (I must say there wasn’t a lot).

The way they explain the material is super detailed, super clear. I dare say I felt I understand ALMOST EVERY TOPIC going into the exam. I wasn’t so sure about their version of qbank, but then I have a feeling that no one’s “qbank” equivalent will give you item sets. The mocks are great. They are on par in terms of difficulty with the exam, or maybe a teeny bit harder, I can’t remember exactly.

I’d definitely go with. What I said above is simply my personal experience. I’m affiliated with neither of these companies. Honestly if you put in the effort with either or you’ll pass! Not forgetting BB, EOC, topic tests, mocks etc I used for L1. I really liked their books and thought their mocks were okay.

I hated their online platform which had issues (the site looks great but the internals aren’t as polished as the skin), their Qbank was worthless (questions wrong & missing parts) and their track record of releasing stuff late sucks & is really frustrating. I’m still deciding what to do for L2. It will pretty much come down to cost I think. I only want the books, some mocks and maybe a review book (secret sauce/11th hour guide). I personally won’t be using a Qbank or videos. Is $379 for books & 3 practice exams. Is $225 for books & $95 for two practice exams.

They’re pretty much on par I’d say. Although if you sign up with now for notification on when their books are available you’ll get 15% off. Will only give you 10% off if you get their PremiumPlus ($1499) or Premium ($1099) packages.

Looks like I’ve just sold myself & will probs go for books & for practice exams maybe. ’s study notes and many video lessons are very good. The weekly online lessons Bill (S2000Magician) did in 2016 were also a nice addition, although I used them more for review and a deeper understanding in some subjects than learning for the first time. You can also download the slides for each lesson which make for nice review notes towards the end. I will also note that ’s study notes and accompanying video lesson on Pension Accounting is invaluable. Maybe it was just me and the way I learn, but the way Basit approaches the Pensions reading is superior to everything I’ve seen, including straight from the curriculum. For practice/mock exams though, I highly recommend including and buying them ala carte if you don’t buy a study package that includes them (one or both of the practice exam volumes and definitely the full online mock).

As of 2016, was still struggling with content quality and delivery issues with their mock exams. A couple of their mocks included old questions on topics that were fully removed from the 2016 curriculum which is pretty inexcusable to be honest.

Their online software used to take the exams and for exam review and performance reporting is still inferior to as well. They need to do better here in my opinion.

Bottom line, both study providers offer great solutions and both have their strengths and weaknesses. You have to do your best to decide which seems to best fit your personal situation and how you learn. Hi Ben, I used Finquiz for my preparation along with CFAI EOC and Blue Boxes. For each reading, I read Finquiz notes and I do EOC/Blue Boxes questions in the books.

When I don’t understand a questions/answer, I complete the info in the CFAI books. Also, Finquiz package have a lot of very very good item-set questions to practice AND they provide 6 complete AM/PM mock exams.

I though Finquiz material coverage was excellent and the practice Q/mock helped me a lot, they were right on point. I’ll be using the same strategy for level 3 and will start in January.